Ministerial circular provides that work-related risk assessment should follow two stages.
is considered mandatory and the essential first step of verification. All employers, including small businesses must do this step that will essentially contained objective, verifiable and, where possible, translated into numbers. The investigation must be conducted on:
The first phase
- statistical data (on accident rates, sick leave, turn-over) and "sentinel events" (eg, reports of physicians, complaints of workers);
- content (load and work hours);
- context analysis work (state of the community work, existence of interpersonal conflicts).
This phase will have to work all the figures involved in internal or external security at work.
Where 'not there are elements of risk that would require "corrective action, according to the guidelines, the assessment is completed: the employer and his staff were required to' give account in the document of assessment and to set only "a monitoring plan for the period thereafter.
The second phase
The scoping phase will only be possible, in what not to depart from the most reliable technical procedures, including international. If most of the procedures developed by various institutions or technical requiring the second phase where the first finds a significant risk, the committee makes it less likely the scoping phase: it is only necessary if the first stage has required corrective action and where corrective action has not produced the desired results and the risk factors remain unchanged.
These actions may include actions such as, for example, changes in corporate organization, internal communication, training and procedures.
then only if the two conditions need to undertake a survey of subjective involving the workers, through questionnaires and / or interviews and / or focus groups that will focus, in particular, on statistical indicators, events-Sentinel , content and context of work.
In companies with more than 5 workers, the second phase could take place simply by means of meetings aimed at problem solving and evaluation of interventions made.
Now accordance with article 29 paragraph 3 of Legislative Decree 81, one should expect that the summit and his staff should initiate any corrective actions suggested from the analysis, and establish a more intensive monitoring program
0 comments:
Post a Comment